All Posts from January, 2010

Cheap Health Insurance , Is It For You?

January 30th, 2010 | By Jim Swank in affordable health insurance | No Comments »

Cheap health insurance is still available, it has not gone the way of the nickel soda or the 10 cent candy bar. As the cost of medical treatment continues to rise, finding cheap health insurance is becoming increasingly difficult. Cheap health insurance is an option for not having any health insurance at all. Choosing cheap health insurance is not something bad, but people have to understand they must go about it the right way.

Cost

Health insurance costs are rising all the time. The costs vary, so do plenty of research before choosing one or another. Many agents will work very hard to get you an affordable health insurance plan for your family at a cost you can live with. The rising cost of health care has made it so that even those with very limited budgets simply have to get some form of health insurance or they run the risk of encountering a large medical bill that can put their financial future in jeopardy. One good tactic to lower your monthly cost is to simply choose a plan with a higher deductible. A good scenario might cost you a couple hundred dollars but a bad scenario could ruin you financially and devastate your family. Check what they cover, deductibles, whether there are maximum payouts under any one category, whether they are for a family or individual health insurance, and of course the cost of the benefits which can vary a great deal. The cost of health insurance can vary greatly depending on the amount of coverage you need, if you were take all the options available in private health insurance then the premium would be astronomical and something which very few people can afford to do. Always check the policy because it might include things which you don’t need, for instance if you are a single man and a policy includes costs for pregnancy then this obviously won’t be needed. If you are considering the lowest cost health insurance then look into purchasing a policy that only covers major illnesses.

Part of the problem is the rising cost of medical care due to uninsured patients. Because of that, hospitals charge inflated rates to cover their own costs. Most low cost health insurance schemes provide for all basic medical and health related expenses, the difference lies in the type and extent of coverage that each of them provides. Low cost health insurance is for people whose annual income falls below a certain range. Health insurance costs depend on the health insurance rate and the range of coverage. Check the monthly cost and amount of deductibles charged and the extent of cost that they cover. There are several ways you can obtain affordable, low cost health insurance.

Search

The costs vary, so do plenty of research before choosing one or another. The best place to start your search for cheap health insurance providers is undoubtedly the internet. However, don’t be tempted to simply perform a search for ‘cheap health insurance’ as there is a high probability that almost all health insurance providers have this statement somewhere in their site’s text. See how cheap term life insurance really be by researching and comparing quote on-line from these top life insurance providers. Generally, health care can be exclusive, therefore if you are searching for a health insurance plan for your family unit, you have to look for plans that are both reasonably priced, and that would offer health coverage you require. Instead, take your time and do your research. With any Commendable Cheap-Health-Insurance plan, you need to read the Cheap-Health-Insurance terms of service of the Cheap-Health-Insurance account and search for any extra Cheap-Health-Insurance fees. As when looking at any health insurance policy, you ought to search for coverage that has a maximum payout of at least $1 million.

Conclusion

As the cost of medical treatment continues to rise, finding cheap health insurance is becoming increasingly difficult. The key to finding cheap Health insurance is knowing every option that is available, a process that can take a long time for an individual to complete. The key with health insurance and especially cheap health insurance is you need to know where health insurance is.

Author: Jim Swank
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Provided by: US Dollar credit card

Easy Ways to Find Affordable Health Insurance in Tampa

January 27th, 2010 | By Gabi Sumner in affordable health insurance | No Comments »

Are you a Tampa resident who is looking to find affordable health insurance? Tampa residents, possibly just like you, who need to buy their own insurance policies often are. While it is nice to have as much health insurance coverage as possible, cost also needs to be taken into consideration. There is good news though. There are a number of different ways that you can go about finding affordable health insurance. Tampa residents, who have already bought their own insurance policies, have used these methods to save themselves money for years now.

Since cost is plays such an important role in finding affordable health insurance, you may want to think about focusing on costs first. You can do this by requesting free health insurance quotes. To get a health insurance quote, you will need to fill out a health insurance quote form. The answers to your form questions will be used to give you an estimated cost of insurance. Since almost all health insurance companies offer free health insurance quotes, they are a nice, simply way to find affordable health insurance. Tampa residents looking for affordable health insurance, just like you, should rely heavily on health insurance quotes.

Speaking of health insurance quotes, when it comes to getting them, you will find that you have a number of different options. For starters, you can contact a Florida health insurance company. Many Florida health insurance companies allow you to request health insurance quotes online or over the phone. In addition to contacting numerous Florida health insurance companies, you can also use online websites which are sometimes referred to as online health insurance quote websites. These websites are designed to pair you with information, as well as insurance quotes, about numerous Florida health insurance plans; plans offered by different companies.

Once you have obtained a collection of health insurance quotes, now matter how you got them, you will then want to try and find affordable health insurance. Tampa residents often have success by taking all of the insurance quotes that they get and comparing them. This gives you a good idea as to what the average cost of health insurance in Florida is. If you are looking for affordable health insurance, particularly the cheapest around, you will want to go with the Florida health insurance quote that is the lowest. This is affordable health insurance. Tampa residents, just like you, are often surprised how easy it is to find affordable health insurance.

Although it is important that you find health insurance that you can afford, you will also want to make sure that you are adequately covered. For that reason, you need closely examine all affordable health insurance plans that you come across. You can do this by reviewing the information given to you; the information that may come along with your insurance quotes. Finding affordable, yet adequate insurance is the best type of insurance to have.

As a reminder, when it comes to buying your own Florida health insurance, you are advised to not automatically assume it is so expensive. Despite what you may believe it is possible to find affordable health insurance; Tampa residents have been doing so for years now.

Author: Gabi Sumner
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Provided by: Credit card currency-exchange fees

Some Republicans Show Willingness to Compromise on Healthcare Reform

January 25th, 2010 | By admin in health insurance | No Comments »

The prospects of a comprehensive healthcare reform bill passing are growing slimmer by the day. However, that does not mean that healthcare reform is dead altogether. After their bruising Senate loss in Massachusetts, Democrats are looking to scale back their proposals for reforming the health insurance industry. They are intent on ending this debate with something to show for a year of work. Previously, Democratic senators and representatives were mainly worried about satisfying the conservative, moderate, and liberal wings of the party. Most Republicans made a political calculation to oppose virtually any form of health care reform proposed by the Democrats. Meanwhile, the Democrats decided to go for broke and seek the most comprehensive reform their entire caucus could be convinced to vote for. As it turns out, Democrats clearly overreached. Now, they need to get at least a handful of Republicans on their side in order to pass legislation.

There were some brief flashes of bipartisanship shortly after Obama’s inaguration, but both parties quickly took sides. Republican Senator Olympia Snowe of Maine initially expressed some degree of support for healthcare reform. She was largely concerned with controlling costs, but so were centrist Democratic senators. In fact, she even supported the idea of a government-run health insurance public option under very limited circumstances–an idea that never gained traction among the entire Democratic caucus in the Senate. Snowe wanted to give the individual health insurance exchange markets, subsidies, and regulations time to work before resorting to further federal interventions. If the private health insurance companies were unable to cover a sufficient percentage of Americans, the public option would be “triggered”.

Over the past several months, increased partisan rancor appeared to have soured Snowe on the issue. Democrats shut her and fellow Republicans out of negotiations, while conservative “tea party” activists were running primary challenges against any legislator deemed insufficiently strong in their opposition to healthcare reform. Granted, there may have been concern that their involvement in committees reconciling the House of Representatives’ and Senate’s bills would not be in good faith–only one Republican in the entire Congress (Louisiana Rep. Joseph Cao) voted in favor. However, the process just managed to alienate potentially amenable legislators like Snowe.

With the election of Scott Brown changing the balance of the Senate, President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, and other Democratic leaders are acknowledging the need to slow down and cut the bill back to its most important, easily understandable elements. For her part, Snowe is waiting for Democrats to make the first move, to amend the bridges burned by the closed-door negotiations. Brown has also expressed his willingness to play a constructive role in reforming America’s current health insurance system. Other moderate Republicans, including Maine’s Susan Collins, may follow suit in crafting a new, more limited bill.

2008 Republican presidential candidate and Arizona Senator John McCain is also open to starting over. He has suggested that some elements of his election year healthcare proposal–such as allowing people to buy individual health insurance across state lines, tax credits for those buying individual or self employed health insurance, and medical malpractice tort reform–be considered. Similar ideas have also been touted by Snowe, as those with the potential of receiving bipartisan support. More gradual changes may also garner greater popularity among the general public than a substantial overhaul. In general, many politicians believe that the current bill is most likely unsalvageable; there is too much bad blood associated with its process.

(Image: Olympia Snowe’s official Senate website)

Yamileth Medina is an up and coming expert on Health Insurance and Healthcare Reform. She aims to help people realize that they can find quality individual health insurance right now. Yamileth lives in Miami, FL.

Article Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/insurance-articles/some-republicans-show-willingness-to-compromise-on-healthcare-reform-1783675.html

5 Mediums to Obtain Health Insurance Rate

January 24th, 2010 | By admin in health insurance | No Comments »

If shopping will take you places, it will also definitely give you the best health insurance rate that you’re rooting for. But in the case of health insurance, it isn’t all about shopping that once you’re done, you’re good to go. Bear in mind that along with shopping and comparing rates, supplying personal information is another thing that you have to consider.

If you’re serious of shopping for rates, prepare yourself for some pertinent information to be shared to a broker or an agent that you may come in contact with. So if you come in prepared to answer questions like your medical information, health history, tobacco usage, alcohol consumption, age, gender and the like, then shopping for rates will come handy to you. But if you prefer taking the less evasive road, going for downloadable rates can be considered. For other options available, the following are ways to obtain a health insurance rate:

  1. Online – If you will try to take advantage of your online resources, you will find that there are almost 100 million results from major search engine’s pages for ‘health insurance companies’. Now that’s a lot of choices! But among these millions of choices available on the internet, sad to say, there are only few or perhaps just a fraction of the overall figure that are considered legitimate. Not all insurance companies you see online have legal rights to operate, so due diligence is a must.
  2. In print – The consumer’s report is said to be free of charge for the public to see for a period of 30 days on the internet. However, charges apply once the period given is over and done. But if you want to get access to insurance company rates for free, going to your local library is a good option. Doing so eliminates a would-be insured to pay for $19 dollars or so to serve as an annual subscription fee.
  3. Government sources – You can also visit various government sites catering to medical insurance rates. If you are a government employee or know someone working for the government, you can actually get a fair idea concerning health insurance rates through their sites.
  4. By phone – You can also get insurance rates by telephoning agents or brokers representing an insurance company. Telephone conversation is much safer than answering questions online. Over the telephone talks allow you to choose not to answer an agent’s query especially if you find questions uncomfortable to answer.
  5. Personal visit – If you want to get first hand information direct from an agent’s mouth and not from word of mouth, you can opt to visit an insurance company personally. Here, you can make necessary negotiations and get your dose of health insurance know-how. The only setback that you have to bear is the time-consuming factor. In reality, you can’t really get significant access to numbers of insurance companies if you will choose to visit them one by one. But if you really want to make sure that you’ll get your money’s worth, a personal visit may be a sound option to take.

Are you looking for the best price on health insurance rate ? Visit http://www.health-insurance-rate.info today for more information!

Article Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/insurance-articles/5-mediums-to-obtain-health-insurance-rate-1774778.html

Don’t Fall Victim To A Health Insurance Scam – 10 “Red Flags” You Should Look For

January 24th, 2010 | By C. Steven Tucker in affordable health insurance | No Comments »

In today’s fast paced world, business owners don’t often have the time to thoroughly check out the companies they rely on to provide goods and services. In many cases, a determination of product/service quality can be made at the time goods are delivered or services are rendered. If goods or services do not meet expectations, there is often an immediate remedy available. For example, poor quality goods can be shipped back to the supplier and/or payment for services can be withheld until services are satisfactorily rendered.

Unfortunately, business owners do not always purchase items that are tangible items, in the sense that they can immediately determine the quality of the goods and/or services at the time of purchase. One example of such a purchase is health insurance. Since health insurance is not usually used immediately after purchase, the quality of care or the legitimacy of the policy may not even come into play until the business owner, or a family member, actually needs to have medical treatment. This is one of the primary reasons that many companies, often appearing legitimate, can get away with selling bogus health insurance coverage to unsuspecting business owners.

In most cases, fraudulent health insurance policies are sold to business owners by telemarketers or “agents” through bogus Associations and Unions. In that, the buyer must join a professional and/or trade association or become a union member to qualify for health insurance. In fact, in a study published by the U.S. General Accountability Office (GAO) in 2004, the GAO found that association schemes ranked at the top of the marketing methods followed by bogus health insurers. According to the report, “Employers and Individuals Are Vulnerable to Unauthorized or Bogus Entities Selling Coverage, between 2000 and 2002, the U.S. Department of Labor and state insurance regulators identified 144 unauthorized entities selling health insurance unlawfully. These entities defrauded 15,000 employers and more than 200,000 policyholders out of $252 million.”

However, it is important to mention that many individual and group health insurance products are endorsed by reputable Associations, such as the ARRP and the American Bar Association and, many reputable Unions, such as the AFLCIO and the Teamsters. These organizations have long been recognized for bringing a common class of professionals or citizens together for other purposes that have very little to do with health insurance. Membership commonly includes a wide range of other benefits in addition to discounted health insurance. Typically, the organizations have a governing organization, a constitution and bylaws, a set of officers, voting rights, regular membership meetings and a professional code of conduct.

Unfortunately, most individuals do not find out that they were making hefty monthly payments or premiums to fraudulent Associations or Unions until they have a severe condition that requires medical treatment. Usually, it isn’t until after they receive treatment that they receive notice from their medical provider that the claim that was submitted to the insurance company was denied and that all the medical charges that were incurred are now their responsibility.

Often, the scheme starts when business owners are contacted by telephone or approached by someone who claims to represent a certain, official sounding, Association or Union. The business owner is then informed that if s/he becomes a member of the Association or joins the Union, s/he could qualify for a low cost group or individual health insurance plan. Typically the Association or Union is promoted to represent self-employed individuals and small business owners. The low cost health insurance is usually presented as one of the many “perks” that the business owner can qualify for, in addition to many other “member” benefits, like discounts on other services, such as dental, eyeglasses, office supplies, hotels, rental cars, etc.

In many instances, these bogus companies involve licensed health insurance agents to sell their fraudulent health insurance products. Sometimes the “agents” know the products are fraudulent, other times, the “agent” also falls prey to the scheme. Often, the schemes prey upon consumers who have been previously declined insurance coverage or suffer from a pre-existing condition. Since these consumers have very limited options to purchase private health insurance coverage, the benefits of an Association or Union membership that offers health insurance coverage for a “membership fee” or “union due” is enticing. To the unsuspecting consumer that has a pre-existing medical condition or is paying high premiums for coverage, the “membership fee” or “union due” is a small price to pay for what they believe will be a quality health plan that provides “guaranteed” coverage with no “pre-existing condition exclusions” and no “waiting periods.”

In many circumstances, the print materials that are left with the consumer are very well designed, however, the majority of the time, the language in the “health plan brochure,” if there is one, is very unclear. The literature may name the entity that is authorized to act as the health plan administrator of the plan, but neglect to name the actual insurance company that is providing the health insurance coverage. Unfortunately, it is often difficult for the consumer to separate the illegitimate companies selling official sounding health plans from the legitimate ones. Typically fraudulent health plans have many commonalities.

Here are 10 “Red Flags” that may indicate health insurance fraud:

1. The “agent” is not a licensed insurance agent but an “enrollment” or “membership” coordinator.

2. The term “discount plan” is written in the product literature, but the term health plan, health insurance or policy is frequently used by the plan promoter. Discount plans often provide nothing more than a discount for medical services, such as prescription medications, eyeglasses, dental, etc. These plans are not designed to offer major medical health insurance coverage.

3. The official sounding “Association or Union” is one that you have never heard of before.

4. The plan is referred to as an ERISA plan. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) is a federal law that allows employers to set up employee benefit plans for employees and their dependents. ERISA plans are not subject to state regulation and are not regulated by the state insurance commissioner. ERISA plans are normally not sold as health insurance, but are instead, established by employers, unions or groups acting on behalf of employers. Therefore, unsuspecting buyers believe these plans actually offer health insurance coverage, when if fact, they do not.

5. The buyer is told that the “membership fee or union dues” includes the health insurance premium, but there is no mention of the word “premium” in any of the plan literature.

6. The plan offers “guaranteed” insurance coverage with no exclusions for “pre-existing conditions” and no “waiting periods.”

7. The plan is significantly cheaper in price than other health insurance plans.

8. The term “reinsured” is used in regards to the plan. Reinsurance is something insurance companies buy to protect themselves against their own risks. It is insurance for insurance companies. Licensed insurers rarely have their agents mention any of their reinsurance arrangements during a sales presentation.

9. If the Association or Union is comprised of members from all walks of life and/or requires its members to state that they belong to a certain trade, class or group of professionals that they have no affiliation with, for example, the Association or Union is said to be comprised of “Food and Beverage” workers, but “Florists” and “Machinists” are allowed to enroll as members.

10. If the Association or Union is said to have a special arrangement with a health insurance company, a plan administrator or another third party that has designed the plan using a legal “loophole” that allows members to purchase health insurance at a discounted rate or to purchase a individual or group health insurance policy.

So how can you protect yourself from falling victim to a fraudulent insurance scam? Make sure you contact your state’s department of Insurance to determine if the health insurance company and the third-party administrator are licensed to do business in your state and make sure that the “agent” selling the plan is a “licensed health insurance agent.” Additionally, make sure that the health insurance company has been approved to sell the particular policy that is being offered. Since it may be difficult to tell if fraud is involved, always put off buying your insurance policy until you have had the opportunity to perform your own due diligence.

2007 Small Business Insurance Services, Inc. http://www.smallbusinessinsuranceservices.com

Author: C. Steven Tucker
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Provided by: Canada duty

This Week in Health Care Reform EasyToInsureME health insurance

January 23rd, 2010 | By admin in health insurance | No Comments »

JANUARY 22, 2010

This Week in Health Care Reform

After months of public debate and private negotiations, health care reform discussions stalled following Tuesday’s Senate vote in Massachusetts. The Democratic Senate lost its 60th vote supermajority when Republican Scott Brown was elected to the United States Senate in the Massachusetts special election.

Health Care Reform Negotiations Post-Massachusetts Special Election

Massachusetts Election of Senate Republican Recasts Debate: Following the election of Republican Scott Brown to the Massachusetts Senate seat Tuesday night, Democratic leaders have been scrambling to revive what could now be a dying bill. The loss of the Democrat’s 60th vote in the Senate opens up the legislation to a Republican filibuster – something the Democrats have managed to avoid thus far in the debate.

House and Senate Democrats met this week to discuss how to move forward with the reform legislation in light of this election and promised Wednesday that they would push ahead. There are a number of options that Democrats are considering, but at this point they have not charted their course.

On Wednesday, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) attempted to rally House Democrats around a strategy to push the Senate bill through the House and onto President Barack Obama’s desk so as to avoid the need to again secure 60 Senate votes. However, the Speaker indicated on Thursday morning that she did not believe she has the needed 218 House votes necessary to move forward. This option would have allowed lawmakersto then propose additional modifications to the approved legislation through a process called “reconciliation,” which only requires 51 votes in the Senate.

Other remaining options:

1.
House and Senate Democrats could also quickly complete the merging of the two bills and vote on the combined package before Mr. Brown is sworn in.
2.
Democratic leaders could attempt to re-engage Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-ME), the only Republican who voted for the Senate Finance Committee’s bill passed in October. Democrats would need to allow her to amend the bill so that she could support its passage and give Democrats the needed 60th vote; or,
3. House and Senate Democrats could essentially start over in their respective chambers and propose scaled-back versions of the bill under “reconciliation” procedures or regular order. Reconciliation procedures would greatly limit the scope of the legislation to issues only related to raising or spending federal funds; therefore, many provisions, such as creating new insurance exchanges and an individual mandate, might be excluded.

President Obama seemed to indicate that he favors having House and Senate lawmakers start over again and produce a scaled-back bill. In addition, more moderate Senate Democrats – hesitant to push through such a huge partisan bill in light of the Massachusetts election – urged leaders to slow down.
Sen. Jim Webb (D-VA) has called on Senate leaders to suspend voting on health care reform until Mr. Brown is sworn into office. President Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) have iterated this same message. Further, Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-CT) called for a bipartisan effort as the best way to achieve health care reform legislation.

Health Care Reform Negotiations Prior to Massachusetts Special Election

Senators Urge Guarantee of Government Savings: In a letter sent last Thursday to Sen. Reid, five Democratic Senators asked for the inclusion of a “fail-safe mechanism” in the final bill. This mechanism would give Congress “the tools to keep costs under control should the current savings estimates fail to materialize.”

Both the Senate and House versions of the bill rely heavily on reductions in government spending, particularly around Medicare, to help pay for reform. Republicans and some nonpartisan analysts believe the government will not follow through on these spending reductions, which will lead to soaring costs.

President Obama Pushes for Less Protection for Biologic Drugs: Last Thursday President Obama pushed for a change in the health care reform legislation that would reduce the number of years that biologic drugs were patent protected from generic competition, previously set at 12 years. White House officials and Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) were negotiating for 10 years protection or less.

Members of the news media speculated that the move to reduce biologic drug protections could be a leverage point for President Obama to pressure the drug industry to increase contributions to pay for health care reform. In fact, the Wall Street Journal reported that Congressional Democrats had already asked drug companies to contribute an additional $10 billion or more, over and above the $80 billion which the industry agreed to early on in the reform negotiations.

President Obama Strikes Deal with Unions: Last week Democratic negotiators struck a deal with union officials and conceded to union demands to scale back a tax on high-end insurance plans. The deal would exempt union workers from having to pay the tax until 2018, five years after the tax would apply to other workers. While the deal would help gain union support for the bill, it would also reduce the amount of tax revenue generated by about 40 percent, to $90 billion. As such, Democratic leaders would need to find other sources of revenue to make up the difference.

Public Opinion

Exit Poll Indicates Health Care Reform as Hot Button Issue: As the ballot polls closed on Tuesday night’s Massachusetts Senate election, an exit poll conducted by Frabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates indicated that 52 percent of voters said that they oppose the federal health care reform measure and 42 percent said they cast their ballot to help stop President Obama from passing this legislation. In addition, 48 percent said that health care was the single issue driving their vote.

Polls Show Discontent: The latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll indicated that almost half of Americans believe the health care reform bill in Congress is a bad idea (46 percent). This figure is up dramatically from April when only 26 percent believed the plan was a bad idea. Further, just 33 percent say the plan is a good idea. Nearly half of those surveyed (48 percent) believe that passing the current legislation would be a “step backward.”

In addition, a new Quinnipiac University poll showed that public support for health care reform continues to decline. Thirty-four percent mostly approve, while 54 percent mostly disapprove. At the end of December, 53 percent of Americans mostly approved, while 36 mostly disapproved.

Looking Ahead

Currently, the path to health care reform is unclear. Democrats seek a way to secure the necessary votes to pass the legislation, and some now question the value of pushing such a large bill. President Obama had hoped to see a final bill prior to his State of the Union address, which has been scheduled for January 27; however, it appears this goal is likely out of reach.

Quoting & Saving just got easier…Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes… Quote all carriers in seconds

Health insurance
Health insurance quotes

Article Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/insurance-articles/this-week-in-health-care-reform-easytoinsureme-health-insurance-1771462.html

North Carolina Individual Health Insurance – Do I Need a Broker?

January 23rd, 2010 | By admin in health insurance | No Comments »

The simple answer to whether you need a broker when purchasing North Carolina individual health insurance is ‘no’, however using a broker that represents all the carriers can make the process much easier and will usually result in saving you money.

Let’s face it, shopping for health insurance is a daunting task and one that most people don’t look forward to nor have the time or will to go through each carrier’s plans and rates to determine what is the best option for their family. If you feel comfortable analyzing the pros and cons of over two hundred health plan options then buying coverage without a broker may work for you. However, most people aren’t and therefore should employ the services of a broker to match their needs to the best health insurance company and plan.

An important point to note is that a broker for North Carolina individual health insurance works independently and not for one particular health insurance company. Their job is to know each carriers plans, how they work, their network coverage, plan limitations, and most importantly their underwriting requirements. It is very difficult to get all this information from each carrier without the assistance of a broker.

You should also be aware that using the services of a broker costs you nothing. Rates are determined by each carrier and approved by the North Carolina Department of Insurance and are the same regardless of where they are purchased. The only difference is whether the fee goes to the broker or stays with the insurance company. 

Once you have chosen a broker it is then simply a matter of confidentially discussing your current medical situation, including details about any pre-existing conditions you have and medications you are currently taking. You should then have a discussion as to what you are looking for in the plan…do you want copay’s for doctor visits and prescription drugs or are you looking for lower premiums and just looking for something to cover the catastrophic type claims?

With this information the broker will then be able to show you plans and deductible options from several carriers for the plan type you have chosen. If you are on any medications or have a pre-existing condition he should also explain to you how the various carriers will likely underwrite you – this is one of the main advantages of using a broker as this information alone could save you thousands a year in premiums. Once you have gone over your options you should have all the information you need in choosing the best North Carolina individual health insurance policy for your situation.

Kent Kingsley is an independent North Carolina health insurance broker and recommends you visit this site North Carolina Individual Health Insurance to learn more about your options. For a complete overview you can also visit North Carolina Health Insurance

Article Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/insurance-articles/north-carolina-individual-health-insurance-do-i-need-a-broker-1768434.html

Choosing Visitors Health Insurance Plans for Foreign Travel

January 22nd, 2010 | By admin in health insurance | No Comments »

Along with pre and post hospitalization expenses, Visitors Medical Insurance also provides coverage for outpatient treatments. Some insurers also offer cashless hospitalization service under Visitors Medical Insurance Plan for the visitors.

International travelers should not consider visitor travel insurance premium costs as an extra expense because the money spent for buying visitors insurance policy will be meager when compared to the policy maximum coverage. Those uninsured visitors who realize this fact after facing a medical emergency will only regret and cannot buy new visitors insurance plan to pay hospital bills. Therefore it is highly recommended that visitors should purchase visitors medical insurance plan before leaving one’s home country.

There are several visitor insurance plans with coverage for wide range of risks. For instance, if visitors buy Atlas America visitor insurance then one child with the adult will be covered free of cost. Therefore if both the husband and wife are visiting a foreign country with their two children then Atlas America visitors insurance will be cheaper. Likewise US residents who are visiting overseas nations can buy Diplomat America visitors insurance plan to get medical coverage while overseas. Visitors should shop around to learn more about coverage in visitors health insurance plans.

Insurance companies have introduced Visitors Medical Insurance Online to make the purchase process convenient for the visitors. At American Visitor Insurance various Visitors Insurance Plans offered by prominent insurers are easily accessible for the visitors. Visitors can evaluate various Visitors Insurance Plans before making an online purchase at American Visitor Insurance.

Visitors can compare visitors insurance policies online to make an informed decision while making a purchase. Once the comparison is done, visitors can make an online purchase of visitors medical insurance using a credit card. A confirmation mail will be sent to the customers email account after the completion of online transaction. The virtual ID card or the policy document of visitors medical insurance which is emailed as a soft copy to the visitors is a valid legal document. Visitors can print the same document and use it as a hard copy if they require it to submit to the hospital in case of a medical emergency. Buying visitors insurance online saves time, energy and money of the visitors.

Pre-certification is the permission that the insured should get from the insurance administrator before undergoing any treatment or surgery. Some insurance administrators ask for pre-certification even for out-patient treatment. However, during an emergency hospitalization visitors can obtain pre-certification after 48 hours of any medical procedure. Therefore it is strongly recommended that visitors should not ignore pre-certification in visitors insurance plan else some insurers may penalize the customers with a deductible.

Visitors Travel Insurance provides insurance coverage options for those travelers who go overseas for their sojourn abroad. Visitors who are thinking of using their visitors medical insurance plan during an emergency should be aware of pre-certification that is to be done before or after hospitalization.

Article Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/insurance-articles/choosing-visitors-health-insurance-plans-for-foreign-travel-1764551.html

Health Insurance – Preventive vs Reactive Care

January 21st, 2010 | By admin in health insurance | No Comments »

Although insurers get a lot of attention when problems with the current health care system are discussed, such discussions are often a case of missing the forest for the trees. This is because the issue of preventive versus reactive care is much bigger and a much bigger impact on costs.

The current effort to reform health care in Washington is a much needed thing although the merits of the current effort are certainly generating a lot of heated debate. Despite the positives and negatives of the bill, what is clear is we need to do something because the cost of health care in the richest country in the world is simply out of control.

One of the biggest problems with health care is the approach we take. We focus almost entirely on treating diseases and health problems. Almost no effort is given to preventing them. This is a huge mistake because the cost of treatment is massively larger than the cost of prevention. Numerous programs have shown that spending just an hour on preventive care with patients would save tens of billions of dollars a year in medical cost.

So, why don’t we see more preventive care? The answer is somewhat morbid. It simply doesn’t pay as well as reactive care. If I see a patient four times a year and put them on a strict nutrition and exercise plan, I might make $400 or so for the visits. If I see a patient only when they come in with a complaint, I will make far more than that in a single visit after I conduct an exam, order a bevy of tests and so on.

The vast majority of doctors do not think of the process in this way. They don’t have to. It is the accepted approach to medical treatment in this country and a major reason why costs are so high compared to practically any other nation. Until we develop a different approach, that simply isn’t going to change.

Mark P. Warner is with BestPlacetoBuyHealthInsurance.com – the best place to buy health insurance and find information on the health care industry on the web.

Article Source:http://www.articlesbase.com/insurance-articles/health-insurance-preventive-vs-reactive-care-1762493.html

Auto Insurance Principles Should Apply to Health Insurance

January 21st, 2010 | By Patt Carpenter in affordable health insurance | No Comments »

Many Americans rely on their automobiles to get to work. No automobile means no job, no rent or mortgage money, no food. A single parent, struggling to make ends meet in the suburbs with 100,000 miles on the odometer, would presumably welcome the guaranteed opportunity for low-priced insurance that would take care of every possible repair on her auto until the day that it reaches 200,000 miles or falls apart, whichever comes first. Especially if the insurance is valid regardless of whether she even changes the oil in the interim.

So why arent the auto insurance companies writing such coverage, either directly or through used auto dealers? And given the importance of reliable transportation, why isnt the public demanding such coverage? The answer is that both auto insurers and the public know that such insurance cant be written for a premium the insured can afford, while still allowing the insurers to stay solvent and make a profit. As a society, we intuitively understand that the costs associated with taking care of every mechanical need of an old automobile, particularly in the absence of regular maintenance, arent insurable. Yet we dont seem to have these same intuitions with respect to health insurance.

If we pull the emotions out of health insurance, which is admittedly hard to do even for this author, and look at health insurance from the economic perspective, there are several insights from auto insurance that can illuminate the design, risk selection, and rating of health insurance.

Auto insurance comes in two forms: the traditional insurance you buy from your agent or direct from an insurance company, and warranties that are purchased from auto manufacturers and dealers. Both are risk transfer and sharing devices and Ill generically refer to both as insurance. Because auto third-party liability insurance has no equivalent in health insurance, for traditional auto insurance, Ill examine only collision and comprehensive insurance insurance covering the vehicle and not third-party liability insurance.

Bumper to Bumper

The following are some commonly accepted principles from auto insurance:

* Bad maintenance voids certain insurance. If an automobile owner never changes the oil, the autos power train warranty is void. In fact, not only does the oil need to be changed, the change needs to be performed by a certified mechanic and documented. Collision insurance doesnt cover cars purposefully driven over a cliff.

* The best insurance is offered for new models. Bumper-to-bumper warranties are offered only on new cars. As they roll off the assembly line, automobiles have a low and relatively consistent risk profile, satisfying the actuarial test for insurance pricing. Furthermore, auto manufacturers usually wrap at least some coverage into the price of the new auto in order to encourage an ongoing relationship with the owner.

* Limited insurance is offered for old model autos. Increasingly limited insurance is offered for old model autos. The bumper-to-bumper warranty expires, the power train warranty eventually expires, and the amount of collision and comprehensive insurance steadily decreases based on the market value of the auto.

* Certain older autos qualify for additional insurance. Certain older autos can qualify for additional coverage, either in terms of warranties for used autos or increased collision and comprehensive insurance for vintage autos. But such insurance is offered only after a careful inspection of the automobile itself.

* No insurance is offered for normal wear and tear. Wiper blades need replacement, brake pads wear out, and bumpers get dings. These arent insurable events. To the extent that a new car dealer will sometimes cover some of these costs, we intuitively understand that were paying for it in the cost of the automobile and that its not really insurance.

* Accidents are the only insurable event for the oldest automobiles. Accidents are generally insurable events even for the oldest autos; with few exceptions service work isnt.

* Insurance doesnt restore all vehicles to pre-accident condition. Auto insurance is limited. If the damage to the auto at any age exceeds the value of the auto, the insurer then pays only the value of the auto. With the exception of vintage autos, the value assigned to the auto goes down over time. So whereas accidents are insurable at any vehicle age, the amount of the accident insurance is increasingly limited.

* Insurance is priced to the risk. Insurance is priced based on the risk profile of both the automobile and the driver. The auto insurer carefully examines both when setting rates.

* We pay for our own insurance. And with few exceptions, automobile insurance isnt tax deductible. As a result, the fear of increasing insurance rates due to traffic violations and/or accidents changes our driving behavior and we sometimes select our automobiles based on their insurability.

Each of the above principles is supported by solid actuarial theory. Although most Americans cant describe the underlying actuarial theories, most everyone understands the above principles of auto insurance at the intuitive level. For sure, as indispensable automobiles are to our lifestyles, there is no loud national movement, accompanied by moral outrage, to change these principles.

Unsustainable Market

In contrast, similar principles are routinely violated in health insurance. To demonstrate this, lets return to the same suburban mother from the opening paragraph. Shes busy working, driving to and from work, and driving her kids to school and activities. She ends each day exhausted, sitting on the couch with fast food. Shes obese, has a sedentary life, a bad diet, and hasnt taken the time to go to the doctor in years. After a simple injury doesnt heal for weeks, she turns up at the emergency room and learns she has type II diabetes. Although type II diabetes is controllable, changing diet and exercise habits and properly tracking her condition takes time and effort and shes never quite successful in implementing the necessary lifestyle changes.

So the initial emergency room visit is only the first of a long list of health care related to non-controlled diabetes and other problems associated with obesity. Whether she has individual or group insurance, her insurance pays for each episode of care, without singling her out for a premium increase, and without charging her any more cost sharing than is charged to the healthiest and most medically diligent insureds. Her coverage continues until she voluntarily changes insurance companies and/or employers or becomes eligible for Medicare. If shes covered under group insurance she may not even pay any premium. Her insurance continues unabated, even though the disease was caused by neglecting her body and she maintains her poor lifestyle even after the disease becomes known.

This just wouldnt happen in auto insurance. This scenario is the auto insurance equivalent of guaranteed access to low-priced auto insurance that takes care of every possible repair, including damage already done, until the day the car falls apart so completely its unsalvageable (death) or reaches 200,000 miles (Medicare), regardless of whether she even changes the oil (takes care of herself) in the interim.

As a society, we dont expect this in private-market auto insurance, but we expect it in private-market health insurance. Furthermore, theres a chorus of national and state interests, which continuously pushes us further away from the auto insurance principles.

The current private health insurance market isnt sustainable. Prices have been consistently increasing faster than inflation for decades. Each year, insureds use more health care than ever before and more people have no insurance at all. Most actuaries and other people in the private health insurance market dont want national health insurance with its bureaucracy and one-size-fits-all benefits. Yet, were trying to sustain a private insurance system, which violates the very principles we know are necessary for private insurance markets.

Yes, health insurance involves the sacredness of human life and is therefore different from auto insurance. But if were to sustain a private-market solution to health insurance, actuaries need to explain to the larger society, in terms that society understands, the rationale for the following principles:

* As sacred as health care is, its still an economic transaction that has to be balanced by individuals and societies, against other economic choices. It cant be unlimited. Sometimes it will be secondary to other choices. On a given day, for example, the mother in our scenario may value her car more than her health.

* Insurance premiums should be paid by the individual and tied to controllable risk factors. This will provide the best incentive for the control of risk factors.

* Although its hard to draw the line between abuse, neglect and ignorance, self-abuse shouldnt be insured and we need to draw that line somewhere.

* The private market cant provide unlimited, self-directed health insurance.

* Routine care and ongoing treatments of chronic conditions can be pre-funded, can even be subsidized, but they dont constitute insurable events.

* Insurance cant be expected to keep every human body in pristine condition. No amount of health care will prevent everyones ultimate death.

* Comprehensive, unlimited, non-subsidized private-market coverage isnt possible for people with severely impaired health.

* The private health market can provide limited non-subsidized health insurance, such as protection from accidents, to even health-impaired individuals.

* Individuals who can afford to do so and who take good care of themselves should be able to buy up to better coverage. People have the option of buying up for everything else in life.

Discussion of these principles is lacking from most of the current health insurance debate. If society can intuitively understand how similar principles apply to health insurance, then they should be able understand the principles in the health insurance context. We need to initiate the debate.

This commentary is solely the opinion of its author. It does not express the official policy of the American Academy of Actuaries; nor does it necessarily reflect the opinions of the Academys individual officers, members, or staff

Author: Patt Carpenter
Article Source: EzineArticles.com
Provided by: Excise Tax

Powered by Yahoo! Answers